Abstract
This chapter compares common data collection and analysis methods used in longitudinal studies in second language pragmatics. Specifically, three data collection methods used to document speech act development are compared: discourse completion tasks (written and spoken), role plays, and naturalistic recordings. I critically discuss benefits and shortcomings of these data collection methods, in response to three questions: (1) What is the nature of speech act data collected in each method?; (2) What kind of analysis is performed on the data collected?; and (3) What conclusions are drawn as evidence for speech act development? The chapter concludes with critical reflections and directions for future investigation into pragmatic development.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Language Learning and Language Teaching |
Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company |
Pages | 7-32 |
Number of pages | 26 |
Volume | 51 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 2018 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- DCT
- L2 pragmatics
- Naturalistic recording
- Research methods
- Role play
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Linguistics and Language