TY - JOUR
T1 - Corrigendum to “Patterns and drivers of recent land cover change on two trailing-edge forest landscapes” [For. Ecol. Manag. 521 (2022) 120449] (Forest Ecology and Management (2022) 521, (S0378112722004431), (10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120449))
AU - Rodman, Kyle C.
AU - Crouse, Joseph E.
AU - Donager, Jonathon J.
AU - Huffman, David W.
AU - Sánchez Meador, Andrew J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2026/1/1
Y1 - 2026/1/1
N2 - The authors regret that we incorrectly stated the species names of pinyon pine discussed in the published version of this article. We referred to the presence of both one-needle (a.k.a. single-leaf) pinyon pine (i.e., Pinus monophylla subsp. fallax) and two-needle pinyon (Pinus edulis [Engelm.]) in our study area in central Arizona, USA. Based on genetic sampling and ongoing taxonomic work by other research groups, most of the pinyon pine in this area likely belong to Pinus × fallax or Pinus fallax, which is considered a hybrid of the species Pinus californarium and Pinus edulis, and can have both one-needled and two-needled fascicles. P. edulis is likely also present in places but becomes less abundant to the south. We present this information to correct our previous error and to ensure that others do not make the same mistake. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
AB - The authors regret that we incorrectly stated the species names of pinyon pine discussed in the published version of this article. We referred to the presence of both one-needle (a.k.a. single-leaf) pinyon pine (i.e., Pinus monophylla subsp. fallax) and two-needle pinyon (Pinus edulis [Engelm.]) in our study area in central Arizona, USA. Based on genetic sampling and ongoing taxonomic work by other research groups, most of the pinyon pine in this area likely belong to Pinus × fallax or Pinus fallax, which is considered a hybrid of the species Pinus californarium and Pinus edulis, and can have both one-needled and two-needled fascicles. P. edulis is likely also present in places but becomes less abundant to the south. We present this information to correct our previous error and to ensure that others do not make the same mistake. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019341851
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105019341851#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123269
DO - 10.1016/j.foreco.2025.123269
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:105019341851
SN - 0378-1127
VL - 599
JO - Forest Ecology and Management
JF - Forest Ecology and Management
M1 - 123269
ER -