TY - JOUR
T1 - Conflicto y estrategia social en la minería y los hidrocarburos Peruanos
T2 - Los usos variados de la participación en la evaluación de impacto ambiental
AU - Jaskoski, Maiah
N1 - Funding Information:
Se agradece a los individuos en Perú que compartieron sus conocimientos sobre el conflicto extractivo y los reglamentos ambientales; a Candelaria Garay y tres revisoras anónimos de Revista de Ciencia Política por sus comentarios en profundidad sobre el manuscrito; y a Moisés Arce, Kent Eaton, Veronica Herrera, Kathy Hochstetler, Lindsay Mayka, y Thea Riofrancos por sus comentarios sobre la ver-sión preliminar del análisis. Los viajes de trabajo de campo para la investigación fueron financiados por Northern Arizona University y el U.S. Department of Defense Threat Reduction Agency Advanced Systems and Concepts Office.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile 1. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - This article examines how local communities mobilized against extraction use the public hearing that is part of environmental impact assessment. Based on analysis of thirteen important hydrocarbon and mining conflicts in Peru, it observes that in some cases communities acted within the provided participatory space, whereas in other cases they orga-nized “around” or “in reaction” to it, using the institutional procedures as focal points for escalating conflict. The study explains variation in community uses of the hearing using three variables: the stage of planned extraction at the time that conflict broke out; whether the project design placed mobilized actors inside or outside of the project’s area of direct impact; and the degree of unity among the “insiders.”.
AB - This article examines how local communities mobilized against extraction use the public hearing that is part of environmental impact assessment. Based on analysis of thirteen important hydrocarbon and mining conflicts in Peru, it observes that in some cases communities acted within the provided participatory space, whereas in other cases they orga-nized “around” or “in reaction” to it, using the institutional procedures as focal points for escalating conflict. The study explains variation in community uses of the hearing using three variables: the stage of planned extraction at the time that conflict broke out; whether the project design placed mobilized actors inside or outside of the project’s area of direct impact; and the degree of unity among the “insiders.”.
KW - Environmental impact assessment
KW - Participatory institutions
KW - Peru
KW - Resource conflict
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120539380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120539380&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4067/S0718-090X2021005000123
DO - 10.4067/S0718-090X2021005000123
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85120539380
SN - 0716-1417
VL - 41
SP - 587
EP - 609
JO - Revista de Ciencia Politica
JF - Revista de Ciencia Politica
IS - 3
ER -