TY - JOUR
T1 - Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system
AU - Richardson, Andrew D.
AU - Keenan, Trevor F.
AU - Migliavacca, Mirco
AU - Ryu, Youngryel
AU - Sonnentag, Oliver
AU - Toomey, Michael
N1 - Funding Information:
The Richardson Lab acknowledges support from Northeastern States Research Cooperative , the National Science Foundation's Macrosystem Biology program (award EF-1065029), the US National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program and the USA National Phenology Network (grant number G10AP00129 from the United States Geological Survey), and the NOAA Climate Program Office, Global Carbon Cycle Program (award NA11OAR4310054). We thank the PIs of sites used in Fig. 4 for making their data publicly available. The contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NSF or USGS.
PY - 2013/2/15
Y1 - 2013/2/15
N2 - Vegetation phenology is highly sensitive to climate change. Phenology also controls many feedbacks of vegetation to the climate system by influencing the seasonality of albedo, surface roughness length, canopy conductance, and fluxes of water, energy, CO2 and biogenic volatile organic compounds. In this review, we first discuss the environmental drivers of phenology, and the impacts of climate change on phenology, in different biomes. We then examine the vegetation-climate feedbacks that are mediated by phenology, and assess the potential impact on these feedbacks of shifts in phenology driven by climate change. We finish with an overview of phenological modeling and we suggest ways in which models might be improved using existing data sets. Several key weaknesses in our current understanding emerge from this analysis. First, we need a better understanding of the drivers of phenology, particularly in under-studied biomes (e.g. tropical forests). We do not have a mechanistic understanding of the role of photoperiod, even in well-studied biomes. In all biomes, the factors controlling senescence and dormancy are not well-documented. Second, for the most part (i.e. with the exception of phenology impacts on CO2 exchange) we have only a qualitative understanding of the feedbacks between vegetation and climate that are mediated by phenology. We need to quantify the magnitude of these feedbacks, and ensure that they are accurately reproduced by models. Third, we need to work towards a new understanding of phenological processes that enables progress beyond the modeling paradigms currently in use. Accurate representation of phenological processes in models that couple the land surface to the climate system is particularly important, especially when such models are being used to predict future climate.
AB - Vegetation phenology is highly sensitive to climate change. Phenology also controls many feedbacks of vegetation to the climate system by influencing the seasonality of albedo, surface roughness length, canopy conductance, and fluxes of water, energy, CO2 and biogenic volatile organic compounds. In this review, we first discuss the environmental drivers of phenology, and the impacts of climate change on phenology, in different biomes. We then examine the vegetation-climate feedbacks that are mediated by phenology, and assess the potential impact on these feedbacks of shifts in phenology driven by climate change. We finish with an overview of phenological modeling and we suggest ways in which models might be improved using existing data sets. Several key weaknesses in our current understanding emerge from this analysis. First, we need a better understanding of the drivers of phenology, particularly in under-studied biomes (e.g. tropical forests). We do not have a mechanistic understanding of the role of photoperiod, even in well-studied biomes. In all biomes, the factors controlling senescence and dormancy are not well-documented. Second, for the most part (i.e. with the exception of phenology impacts on CO2 exchange) we have only a qualitative understanding of the feedbacks between vegetation and climate that are mediated by phenology. We need to quantify the magnitude of these feedbacks, and ensure that they are accurately reproduced by models. Third, we need to work towards a new understanding of phenological processes that enables progress beyond the modeling paradigms currently in use. Accurate representation of phenological processes in models that couple the land surface to the climate system is particularly important, especially when such models are being used to predict future climate.
KW - Autumn senescence
KW - Biosphere-atmosphere interactions
KW - Budburst
KW - Carbon cycle
KW - Climate change
KW - Global warming
KW - Models
KW - Phenology
KW - Seasonality
KW - Spring onset
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869873408&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869873408&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.012
DO - 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.012
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84869873408
SN - 0168-1923
VL - 169
SP - 156
EP - 173
JO - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
JF - Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
ER -