Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Northern Arizona University Home
Home
Profiles
Departments and Centers
Scholarly Works
Activities
Grants
Datasets
Prizes
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Citizens United, public health, and democracy: The Supreme Court ruling, its implications, and proposed action
William H. Wiist
Health and Human Services, College of (CHHS)
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
16
Scopus citations
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Citizens United, public health, and democracy: The Supreme Court ruling, its implications, and proposed action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Public Health
100%
Democracy
100%
Corporate
100%
Supreme Court Rulings
100%
Citizens United
100%
Advocacy Advertising
50%
Health Policy
25%
Hillary Clinton
25%
U.S. Supreme Court
25%
Legislators
25%
Court Rulings
25%
Treasury
25%
Freedom of Speech
25%
Nonprofit Organizations
25%
Election Campaign
25%
Presidential Candidates
25%
Citizen Groups
25%
Citizens United V. FEC
25%
Independent Expenditures
25%
Political Speech
25%
Health Democracy
25%
Social Sciences
Health Policy
100%
Courts
100%
Democracy
100%
USA
50%
Advocacy
50%
Elections
50%
Nonprofit Organizations
25%
Election Campaign
25%
Political Speech
25%