Carbon credit possibilities and economic implications of fuel reduction treatments

Tibor Vegh, Ching Hsun Huang, Alex Finkral

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


We determined the difference in carbon (C) stocks and C emissions between treated and untreated ponderosa pine stands over 100 years on the Apache and Sitgreaves National Forests, Arizona, USA, under assumed treatment scenarios, wildfire frequency, and annual percentage of area burned. Compared with the no-action scenario, total C stocks (live and dead biomass) were lower in the treatment scenarios because of timber removals from thinnings, whereas aboveground live C stocks were higher in the treatment scenarios. When total C stocks were used as the baseline, net present values (NPVs) of treatments were in the range of -$759.42 and -$722.58 ha1 if timber and reduced requirement for C in a buffer pool were assumed to be creditable, and NPVs increased significantly if C in wood products was also eligible for C credit. When aboveground live C stocks were chosen as the baseline, NPVs ranged from -$759.42 to $2,700.44 ha-1 with revenues from timber stumpage value, reduced buffer pool, and/or C in wood products. C emissions from simulated wildfires were lower in the two treatment scenarios than in the no-action scenario. The heavier thinning treatment resulted in lower C emissions from wildfires than with the lighter thinning treatment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57-65
Number of pages9
JournalWestern Journal of Applied Forestry
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 2013


  • Carbon emissions
  • Carbon stocks
  • Long-lived wood products
  • Net present value
  • Reversal risk ratings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Forestry
  • Plant Science


Dive into the research topics of 'Carbon credit possibilities and economic implications of fuel reduction treatments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this