Can static foot posture measurements predict regional plantar surface area?

  • Thomas G. McPoil
  • , Mathew Haager
  • , John Hilt
  • , John Klapheke
  • , Ray Martinez
  • , Cory van Steenwyk
  • , Nicholas Weber
  • , Mark W. Cornwall
  • , Michael Bade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The intent of this study was to determine if the use of a single or combination of static foot posture measurements can be used to predict rearfoot, midfoot, and forefoot plantar surface area in individuals with pronated or normal foot types. Methods: Twelve foot measurements were collected on 52 individuals (mean age 25.8 years) with the change in midfoot width used to place subjects in a pronated or normal foot mobility group. Dynamic plantar contact area was collected during walking with a pressure sensor platform. The 12 measures were entered into a stepwise regression analysis to determine the optimal set of measures associated with regional plantar surface area. Results: A two variable model was found to describe the relationship between the foot measurements and forefoot plantar contact area (r2=0.79, p<0.0001). A four variable model was found to describe the relationship between the foot measurements and midfoot plantar contact area (r2=0.85, p<0.0001) in those individuals with a 1.26cm or greater change in midfoot width. Conclusions: The results indicate that clinicians can use a combination of simple, reliable and time efficient foot measures to explain 79% and 85% of the plantar surface area in the forefoot and midfoot, respectively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-168
Number of pages8
JournalFoot
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Keywords

  • Foot mobility
  • Foot posture
  • Plantar surface area
  • Reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Podiatry
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can static foot posture measurements predict regional plantar surface area?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this