Cabozantinib and nivolumab with or without live bacterial supplementation in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomized phase 1 trial

Hedyeh Ebrahimi, Nazli Dizman, Luis Meza, Jasnoor Malhotra, Xiaochen Li, Tanya Dorff, Paul Frankel, Marian Llamas-Quitiquit, Joann Hsu, Zeynep B. Zengin, Marice Alcantara, Daniela Castro, Benjamin Mercier, Neal Chawla, Alex Chehrazi-Raffle, Regina Barragan-Carrillo, Salvador Jaime-Casas, Ameish Govindarajan, John Gillece, Jeffrey TrentPeter P. Lee, Thomas P. Parks, Motomichi Takahashi, Atsushi Hayashi, Marcin Kortylewski, J. Gregory Caporaso, Keehoon Lee, Abhishek Tripathi, Sumanta K. Pal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Supplementation with CBM588, a bifidogenic live bacterial product, has been associated with improved clinical outcomes in persons with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) receiving nivolumab and ipilimumab. However, its effect on those receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor-based combinations is unknown. In this open-label, randomized, investigator-initiated, phase 1 study, 30 participants with locally advanced or mRCC with histological confirmation of clear cell, papillary or sarcomatoid component were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to receive cabozantinib (an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, MET and AXL) and nivolumab (anti-programmed cell death protein 1) with or without CBM588 as first-line treatment. Metagenomic sequencing was performed on stool samples to characterize their gut microbiome at baseline and 13 weeks into treatment. The primary endpoint was a change in the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium spp.; secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity profile. The primary endpoint of the study was not met and the addition of CBM588 to cabozantinib and nivolumab did not result in a difference in the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium spp. or alpha diversity (as measured by the Shannon index). However, ORR was significantly higher in participants treated with CBM588 compared to those in the control arm (14 of 19, 74% versus 2 of 10, 20%; P = 0.01). PFS at 6 months was 84% (16 of 19) and 60% (6 of 10) in the experimental and control arms, respectively. No significant difference in toxicity profile was seen between the study arms. Our results provide a preliminary signal of improved clinical activity with CBM588 in treatment-naive participants with mRCC receiving cabozantinib and nivolumab. Further investigation is needed to confirm these findings and better characterize the underlying mechanism driving this effect. ClinicalTrials.gov

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2576-2585
Number of pages10
JournalNature Medicine
Volume30
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cabozantinib and nivolumab with or without live bacterial supplementation in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomized phase 1 trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this