Brussels Bound: Policy Experience and Candidate Selection in European Elections

Daniel Pemstein, Stephen A. Meserve, William T. Bernhard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Parties in list systems must select candidates to best accomplish their electoral, organizational, and policy goals. In particular, parties must balance nominees’ policy-making potential against other aspects of candidate quality, such as electoral viability. We exploit the unique variation in candidates and parties in European elections to study this trade-off. We develop a statistical ranking model to examine how parties facing varying strategic contexts construct electoral lists and apply it to a novel data set chronicling the political backgrounds of candidates in the 2009 European parliamentary elections. Parties that place high salience on the target legislature, are well positioned to influence policy once in office, and have less access to competing policy-making venues place particular emphasis on institution-specific policy-making experience relative to other types of candidate experience. This systematic variation in parties’ candidate nomination strategies may fundamentally alter legislative output and partisan policy influence.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1421-1453
Number of pages33
JournalComparative Political Studies
Volume48
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 12 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • candidate selection
  • EU politics and policy
  • political parties

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Brussels Bound: Policy Experience and Candidate Selection in European Elections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this