Bottom-up approaches for estimating terrestrial GHG budgets: Bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven methods

Benjamin Poulter; Ana Bastos; Josep G. Canadell; Philippe Ciais; Deborah Huntzinger; Richard A. Houghton; Werner Kurz; A. M.Roxana Petrescu; Julia Pongratz; Stephen Sitch; Sebastiaan Luyssaert

doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-814952-2.00010-1

Bottom-up approaches for estimating terrestrial GHG budgets: Bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven methods

Benjamin Poulter, Ana Bastos, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Deborah Huntzinger, Richard A. Houghton, Werner Kurz, A. M.Roxana Petrescu, Julia Pongratz, Stephen Sitch, Sebastiaan Luyssaert

Earth and Sustainability

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

This chapter introduces greenhouse gas accounting activities that use “bottom-up” approaches. Bottom-up approaches can be categorized into inventory, bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven (i.e., remote sensing) methods. Activity data combined with emission factors, gain-loss, or stock-change analyses are the basis of each approach used to carry out the reporting and accounting. Uncertainties stem from data sources, model parameters, type of forcing, reporting level, and uncertainties between methods relate to definitions inherent to reporting requirements by the IPCC and UNFCCC.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Balancing Greenhouse Gas Budgets
Subtitle of host publication	Accounting for Natural and Anthropogenic Flows of CO2 and other Trace Gases
Publisher	Elsevier
Pages	59-85
Number of pages	27
ISBN (Electronic)	9780128149522
ISBN (Print)	9780128149539
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814952-2.00010-1
State	Published - Jan 1 2022

Keywords

Bookkeeping
Bottom-up methods
Dynamic global vegetation model
Inventory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Access to Document

10.1016/B978-0-12-814952-2.00010-1

Cite this

Poulter, B., Bastos, A., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Huntzinger, D., Houghton, R. A., Kurz, W., Petrescu, A. M. R., Pongratz, J., Sitch, S., & Luyssaert, S. (2022). Bottom-up approaches for estimating terrestrial GHG budgets: Bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven methods. In Balancing Greenhouse Gas Budgets: Accounting for Natural and Anthropogenic Flows of CO2 and other Trace Gases (pp. 59-85). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814952-2.00010-1

Bottom-up approaches for estimating terrestrial GHG budgets: Bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven methods. / Poulter, Benjamin; Bastos, Ana; Canadell, Josep G. et al.
Balancing Greenhouse Gas Budgets: Accounting for Natural and Anthropogenic Flows of CO2 and other Trace Gases. Elsevier, 2022. p. 59-85.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Poulter, B, Bastos, A, Canadell, JG, Ciais, P, Huntzinger, D, Houghton, RA, Kurz, W, Petrescu, AMR, Pongratz, J, Sitch, S & Luyssaert, S 2022, Bottom-up approaches for estimating terrestrial GHG budgets: Bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven methods. in Balancing Greenhouse Gas Budgets: Accounting for Natural and Anthropogenic Flows of CO2 and other Trace Gases. Elsevier, pp. 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814952-2.00010-1

Poulter B, Bastos A, Canadell JG, Ciais P, Huntzinger D, Houghton RA et al. Bottom-up approaches for estimating terrestrial GHG budgets: Bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven methods. In Balancing Greenhouse Gas Budgets: Accounting for Natural and Anthropogenic Flows of CO2 and other Trace Gases. Elsevier. 2022. p. 59-85 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-814952-2.00010-1

@inbook{bf7a6c6904834c97aa8d77ba2d7fa560,

title = "Bottom-up approaches for estimating terrestrial GHG budgets: Bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven methods",

abstract = "This chapter introduces greenhouse gas accounting activities that use “bottom-up” approaches. Bottom-up approaches can be categorized into inventory, bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven (i.e., remote sensing) methods. Activity data combined with emission factors, gain-loss, or stock-change analyses are the basis of each approach used to carry out the reporting and accounting. Uncertainties stem from data sources, model parameters, type of forcing, reporting level, and uncertainties between methods relate to definitions inherent to reporting requirements by the IPCC and UNFCCC.",

keywords = "Bookkeeping, Bottom-up methods, Dynamic global vegetation model, Inventory",

author = "Benjamin Poulter and Ana Bastos and Canadell, {Josep G.} and Philippe Ciais and Deborah Huntzinger and Houghton, {Richard A.} and Werner Kurz and Petrescu, {A. M.Roxana} and Julia Pongratz and Stephen Sitch and Sebastiaan Luyssaert",

year = "2022",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/B978-0-12-814952-2.00010-1",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9780128149539",

pages = "59--85",

booktitle = "Balancing Greenhouse Gas Budgets",

publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Bottom-up approaches for estimating terrestrial GHG budgets

T2 - Bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven methods

AU - Poulter, Benjamin

AU - Bastos, Ana

AU - Canadell, Josep G.

AU - Ciais, Philippe

AU - Huntzinger, Deborah

AU - Houghton, Richard A.

AU - Kurz, Werner

AU - Petrescu, A. M.Roxana

AU - Pongratz, Julia

AU - Sitch, Stephen

AU - Luyssaert, Sebastiaan

PY - 2022/1/1

Y1 - 2022/1/1

N2 - This chapter introduces greenhouse gas accounting activities that use “bottom-up” approaches. Bottom-up approaches can be categorized into inventory, bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven (i.e., remote sensing) methods. Activity data combined with emission factors, gain-loss, or stock-change analyses are the basis of each approach used to carry out the reporting and accounting. Uncertainties stem from data sources, model parameters, type of forcing, reporting level, and uncertainties between methods relate to definitions inherent to reporting requirements by the IPCC and UNFCCC.

AB - This chapter introduces greenhouse gas accounting activities that use “bottom-up” approaches. Bottom-up approaches can be categorized into inventory, bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven (i.e., remote sensing) methods. Activity data combined with emission factors, gain-loss, or stock-change analyses are the basis of each approach used to carry out the reporting and accounting. Uncertainties stem from data sources, model parameters, type of forcing, reporting level, and uncertainties between methods relate to definitions inherent to reporting requirements by the IPCC and UNFCCC.

KW - Bookkeeping

KW - Bottom-up methods

KW - Dynamic global vegetation model

KW - Inventory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85137487071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85137487071&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-12-814952-2.00010-1

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-814952-2.00010-1

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85137487071

SN - 9780128149539

SP - 59

EP - 85

BT - Balancing Greenhouse Gas Budgets

PB - Elsevier

ER -

Bottom-up approaches for estimating terrestrial GHG budgets: Bookkeeping, process-based modeling, and data-driven methods

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this