Being Mindful About Overuse of Total Scores: a Comparison of Total Scores and Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis Scores in Assessing Mindfulness Across Race/Ethnicity, Age, and PTSD Diagnosis

  • Alyssa Lozano
  • , Lissette M. Saavedra
  • , Tara G. Bautista
  • , Mariana Sanchez
  • , Antonio A. Morgan-López
  • , Hortensia Amaro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Although mindfulness-based interventions show initial positive results on a range of substance use behaviors, evaluations of mindfulness-based interventions would benefit from state-of-the-art alternative approaches to the ubiquitous use of sum or total scores. Sum scores do not reflect “true” underlying mindfulness as they do not consider differences in the relative weight of each item and/or the possibility that measurement may differ across groups. The purpose of this study was to identify measurement noninvariance/differential item functioning (MNI/DIF) across racial and ethnic groups, age groups, and those with PTSD diagnoses and differences in inferences on the factors of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire between scale scores estimated using moderated nonlinear factor analysis (MNLFA) and a total score analog model (TSA). Age, PTSD diagnosis, non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity, Hispanic race/ethnicity, and other race/ethnicity showed statistically significant MNI/DIF. In the MNLFA model, PTSD diagnosis and Hispanic race/ethnicity contributed to significant MNI/DIF on the “true” acting with awareness, describing, and observing latent factors such that Hispanic participants were higher on average on acting with awareness scores and lower on average on describing and observing scores. The TSA model failed to estimate significant differences on acting with awareness score for participants with PTSD diagnosis. Additionally, in the TSA model, there was an increase in the effect size of Hispanic participants’ baseline describing and observing estimates, thus overestimating differences in respective scores for Hispanic participants. Failing to correct for MNI/DIF in mindfulness scale scores can impact inferences and effect sizes for group differences in mindfulness thus creating bias in characterizing mindfulness, particularly for Hispanic individuals and those with PTSD diagnoses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1276-1288
Number of pages13
JournalPrevention Science
Volume26
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Hispanic
  • Mindfulness
  • PTSD
  • psychometrics
  • women

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Being Mindful About Overuse of Total Scores: a Comparison of Total Scores and Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis Scores in Assessing Mindfulness Across Race/Ethnicity, Age, and PTSD Diagnosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this