TY - JOUR
T1 - Being Mindful About Overuse of Total Scores
T2 - a Comparison of Total Scores and Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis Scores in Assessing Mindfulness Across Race/Ethnicity, Age, and PTSD Diagnosis
AU - Lozano, Alyssa
AU - Saavedra, Lissette M.
AU - Bautista, Tara G.
AU - Sanchez, Mariana
AU - Morgan-López, Antonio A.
AU - Amaro, Hortensia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Although mindfulness-based interventions show initial positive results on a range of substance use behaviors, evaluations of mindfulness-based interventions would benefit from state-of-the-art alternative approaches to the ubiquitous use of sum or total scores. Sum scores do not reflect “true” underlying mindfulness as they do not consider differences in the relative weight of each item and/or the possibility that measurement may differ across groups. The purpose of this study was to identify measurement noninvariance/differential item functioning (MNI/DIF) across racial and ethnic groups, age groups, and those with PTSD diagnoses and differences in inferences on the factors of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire between scale scores estimated using moderated nonlinear factor analysis (MNLFA) and a total score analog model (TSA). Age, PTSD diagnosis, non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity, Hispanic race/ethnicity, and other race/ethnicity showed statistically significant MNI/DIF. In the MNLFA model, PTSD diagnosis and Hispanic race/ethnicity contributed to significant MNI/DIF on the “true” acting with awareness, describing, and observing latent factors such that Hispanic participants were higher on average on acting with awareness scores and lower on average on describing and observing scores. The TSA model failed to estimate significant differences on acting with awareness score for participants with PTSD diagnosis. Additionally, in the TSA model, there was an increase in the effect size of Hispanic participants’ baseline describing and observing estimates, thus overestimating differences in respective scores for Hispanic participants. Failing to correct for MNI/DIF in mindfulness scale scores can impact inferences and effect sizes for group differences in mindfulness thus creating bias in characterizing mindfulness, particularly for Hispanic individuals and those with PTSD diagnoses.
AB - Although mindfulness-based interventions show initial positive results on a range of substance use behaviors, evaluations of mindfulness-based interventions would benefit from state-of-the-art alternative approaches to the ubiquitous use of sum or total scores. Sum scores do not reflect “true” underlying mindfulness as they do not consider differences in the relative weight of each item and/or the possibility that measurement may differ across groups. The purpose of this study was to identify measurement noninvariance/differential item functioning (MNI/DIF) across racial and ethnic groups, age groups, and those with PTSD diagnoses and differences in inferences on the factors of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire between scale scores estimated using moderated nonlinear factor analysis (MNLFA) and a total score analog model (TSA). Age, PTSD diagnosis, non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity, Hispanic race/ethnicity, and other race/ethnicity showed statistically significant MNI/DIF. In the MNLFA model, PTSD diagnosis and Hispanic race/ethnicity contributed to significant MNI/DIF on the “true” acting with awareness, describing, and observing latent factors such that Hispanic participants were higher on average on acting with awareness scores and lower on average on describing and observing scores. The TSA model failed to estimate significant differences on acting with awareness score for participants with PTSD diagnosis. Additionally, in the TSA model, there was an increase in the effect size of Hispanic participants’ baseline describing and observing estimates, thus overestimating differences in respective scores for Hispanic participants. Failing to correct for MNI/DIF in mindfulness scale scores can impact inferences and effect sizes for group differences in mindfulness thus creating bias in characterizing mindfulness, particularly for Hispanic individuals and those with PTSD diagnoses.
KW - Hispanic
KW - Mindfulness
KW - PTSD
KW - psychometrics
KW - women
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105024339282
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105024339282#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1007/s11121-025-01862-3
DO - 10.1007/s11121-025-01862-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 41361140
AN - SCOPUS:105024339282
SN - 1389-4986
VL - 26
SP - 1276
EP - 1288
JO - Prevention Science
JF - Prevention Science
IS - 8
ER -