An assessment of construct proliferation within destructive leadership research

Jeremy D. Mackey, Michael A. Phillipich, Charn P. McAllister, Katherine C. Alexander

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Leadership research has been of considerable scholarly and practical interest for millennia. Over the past few decades, destructive leadership has become of special interest due to its detrimental impacts on followers and organizations. The recent fascination with destructive leadership has driven a tremendous amount of research in a relatively short period of time. However, this growth has generated a body of research that is disconnected because the many different destructive leadership styles and behaviors identified have created construct proliferation. Ultimately, construct proliferation threatens the cohesion and utility of knowledge within the destructive leadership literature. Our motivation for this chapter is to provide guidance regarding how researchers, reviewers, and practitioners can navigate the overabundance of constructs within destructive leadership research. Overall, our review of destructive leadership constructs and measures creates a path forward using the current foundation of destructive leadership knowledge as this field navigates the challenges created by construct proliferation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationResearch Handbook on Destructive Leadership
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Pages310-325
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781035315925
ISBN (Print)9781035315918
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Abusive supervision
  • Construct proliferation
  • Destructive leadership
  • Leadership
  • Negative leadership
  • Unethical supervision

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
  • General Business, Management and Accounting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An assessment of construct proliferation within destructive leadership research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this