TY - JOUR
T1 - Adverb placement in L1 and L2 spoken production
T2 - The effect of linguistic and extralinguistic factors
AU - Larsson, Tove
AU - Callies, Marcus
AU - Dixon, Tülay
AU - Hasselgård, Hilde
AU - Hober, Nicole
AU - Judith Laso, Natalia
AU - van Vuuren, Sanne
AU - Verdaguer, Isabel
AU - Paquot, Magali
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© John Benjamins Publishing Company.
PY - 2025/7/17
Y1 - 2025/7/17
N2 - Most existing research on adverb placement has focused exclusively on writing. This is unfortunate, given that the spoken mode offers limited opportunity for pre-planning and post-editing and may thus more readily reveal patterns of L1 transfer. Further, previous studies rarely consider the impact of the linguistic context surrounding the adverb. This study broadens our understanding of (i) the potential role of L1 transfer, and (ii) the extralinguistic and linguistic factors that influence adverb placement. We look at spoken English produced by students from seven L1 backgrounds: Dutch, English, French, German, Norwegian, Spanish, and Swedish. The results show that the most influential factors in explaining differences in adverb placement were the presence or absence of auxiliaries and the type of adverb. We find only very limited evidence of L1 transfer, suggesting that upper-intermediate to advanced learners have largely mastered the positional preferences of adverbs in English, even in restrictive production contexts.
AB - Most existing research on adverb placement has focused exclusively on writing. This is unfortunate, given that the spoken mode offers limited opportunity for pre-planning and post-editing and may thus more readily reveal patterns of L1 transfer. Further, previous studies rarely consider the impact of the linguistic context surrounding the adverb. This study broadens our understanding of (i) the potential role of L1 transfer, and (ii) the extralinguistic and linguistic factors that influence adverb placement. We look at spoken English produced by students from seven L1 backgrounds: Dutch, English, French, German, Norwegian, Spanish, and Swedish. The results show that the most influential factors in explaining differences in adverb placement were the presence or absence of auxiliaries and the type of adverb. We find only very limited evidence of L1 transfer, suggesting that upper-intermediate to advanced learners have largely mastered the positional preferences of adverbs in English, even in restrictive production contexts.
KW - adverb placement
KW - L1 English
KW - L1 transfer
KW - L2 English
KW - spoken production
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105011968304
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105011968304#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1075/ijcl.23047.lar
DO - 10.1075/ijcl.23047.lar
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105011968304
SN - 1384-6655
VL - 30
SP - 79
EP - 105
JO - International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
JF - International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
IS - 1
ER -