TY - JOUR
T1 - Adapting the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) Framework to Automated Vehicle Development
AU - Swaminathan, Sunder
AU - Wishart, Jeffrey
AU - Zhao, Junfeng
AU - Russo, Brendan
AU - Rahimi, Shujauddin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 SAE International. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2025/4/1
Y1 - 2025/4/1
N2 - The technological advancements in the automotive industry have seen a significant leap with the introduction of automated driving system (ADS)-equipped Vehicles (AVs), with potential for enhanced safety, efficiency, and mobility. As the development of an AV transitions from the stages of conceptual design to deployment, assessing the maturity of the technology through a structured framework is crucial. This paper proposes the adaptation of the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) framework originally developed by NASA (and adopted widely in a variety of industries) to the AV industry to provide a consistent, understandable, and transparent method to describe an AV product's stage of development. The TRL framework is mated to the existing safety case framework (SCF) developed in the Automated Vehicle - Test and Evaluation Process (AV-TEP) Mission, a collaboration between Science Foundation Arizona and Arizona State University. The claim that the AV is ready to transition from one TRL to the next is argued through the satisfaction of requirements for each TRL and supported by evidence and data. The requirements for each level are established for the three pillars of the AV-TEP Mission's SCF, each of which address safety-critical aspects of AV development: the Safety Management System pillar focuses on organizational safety and mitigation of identified risks, the Design Methods pillar emphasizes the importance of rigorous engineering design practices, and the Testing pillar validates and verifies the AV and its subsystems through various testing methods. This paper aims to address the need for all stakeholders (AV developers, regulatory agencies, and the general public) to concur on the development state of an AV at any given time and provide an agreed-upon roadmap for when and how the transition through each stage of development should occur. The ultimate culmination of this TRL-framed process is the on-road deployment of the AV in its particular ODD and usage specification in a manner that assures public safety.
AB - The technological advancements in the automotive industry have seen a significant leap with the introduction of automated driving system (ADS)-equipped Vehicles (AVs), with potential for enhanced safety, efficiency, and mobility. As the development of an AV transitions from the stages of conceptual design to deployment, assessing the maturity of the technology through a structured framework is crucial. This paper proposes the adaptation of the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) framework originally developed by NASA (and adopted widely in a variety of industries) to the AV industry to provide a consistent, understandable, and transparent method to describe an AV product's stage of development. The TRL framework is mated to the existing safety case framework (SCF) developed in the Automated Vehicle - Test and Evaluation Process (AV-TEP) Mission, a collaboration between Science Foundation Arizona and Arizona State University. The claim that the AV is ready to transition from one TRL to the next is argued through the satisfaction of requirements for each TRL and supported by evidence and data. The requirements for each level are established for the three pillars of the AV-TEP Mission's SCF, each of which address safety-critical aspects of AV development: the Safety Management System pillar focuses on organizational safety and mitigation of identified risks, the Design Methods pillar emphasizes the importance of rigorous engineering design practices, and the Testing pillar validates and verifies the AV and its subsystems through various testing methods. This paper aims to address the need for all stakeholders (AV developers, regulatory agencies, and the general public) to concur on the development state of an AV at any given time and provide an agreed-upon roadmap for when and how the transition through each stage of development should occur. The ultimate culmination of this TRL-framed process is the on-road deployment of the AV in its particular ODD and usage specification in a manner that assures public safety.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008225913
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105008225913&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4271/2025-01-8671
DO - 10.4271/2025-01-8671
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:105008225913
SN - 0148-7191
JO - SAE Technical Papers
JF - SAE Technical Papers
T2 - 2025 SAE World Congress Experience, WCX 2025
Y2 - 8 April 2025 through 10 April 2025
ER -