TY - JOUR
T1 - Academic Skills Used by College Students Without Brain Injury
T2 - A Validation Study
AU - Isaki, Emi
AU - Lininger, Monica R.
AU - Cross, Evelyn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a brief, ecologically valid measure of academic-related skills used by students in both in-person and online higher education. Method: Twelve undergraduate (n = 7) and graduate (n= 5) college students without brain injury participated in a pilot study followed by focus group semi-structured interviews. Next, preliminary normative data were collected from a larger sample of undergraduate (n = 152) and graduate (n = 73) students without brain injury, ages 18–35 years. Participants were asked to rate the cognitive, communicative, and academic skills they used for in-person and online instruc-tion. The students completed a 27-item scale (Likert, 1 = strongly disagree to 6= strongly agree). Results: Following an exploratory factor analysis, seven distinct factors were retained creating the final instrument in the population without brain injury. These included sustained attention, metacognition, working memory, problem solving, reading comprehension, selective attention, and processing speed. Conclusions: Responses from college students without brain injury helped to validate items on the College Readiness After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury scale. Undergraduate and graduate students identified the skills they used in both online and in-person academic learning environments. Future plans include the recruitment of students with mild traumatic brain injury returning to higher edu-cation to investigate the sensitivity of the scale.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a brief, ecologically valid measure of academic-related skills used by students in both in-person and online higher education. Method: Twelve undergraduate (n = 7) and graduate (n= 5) college students without brain injury participated in a pilot study followed by focus group semi-structured interviews. Next, preliminary normative data were collected from a larger sample of undergraduate (n = 152) and graduate (n = 73) students without brain injury, ages 18–35 years. Participants were asked to rate the cognitive, communicative, and academic skills they used for in-person and online instruc-tion. The students completed a 27-item scale (Likert, 1 = strongly disagree to 6= strongly agree). Results: Following an exploratory factor analysis, seven distinct factors were retained creating the final instrument in the population without brain injury. These included sustained attention, metacognition, working memory, problem solving, reading comprehension, selective attention, and processing speed. Conclusions: Responses from college students without brain injury helped to validate items on the College Readiness After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury scale. Undergraduate and graduate students identified the skills they used in both online and in-person academic learning environments. Future plans include the recruitment of students with mild traumatic brain injury returning to higher edu-cation to investigate the sensitivity of the scale.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000098975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105000098975&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00083
DO - 10.1044/2024_AJSLP-24-00083
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105000098975
SN - 1058-0360
VL - 33
SP - 2524
EP - 2535
JO - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
JF - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
IS - 5
ER -