A Systematic Review of Dietary Supplements and Alternative Therapies for Weight Loss

  • John A. Batsis
  • , John W. Apolzan
  • , Pamela J. Bagley
  • , Heather B. Blunt
  • , Vidita Divan
  • , Sonia Gill
  • , Angela Golden
  • , Shalini Gundumraj
  • , Steven B. Heymsfield
  • , Scott Kahan
  • , Katherine Kopatsis
  • , Ava Port
  • , Elizabeth Prout Parks
  • , Clifford A. Reilly
  • , Domenica Rubino
  • , Katherine H. Saunders
  • , Ryan Shean
  • , Luai Tabaza
  • , Abishek Stanley
  • , Beverly G. Tchang
  • Shivani Gundumraj, Srividya Kidambi

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

66 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Dietary supplements and alternative therapies are commercialized as a panacea for obesity/weight gain as a result of the minimal regulatory requirements in demonstrating efficacy. These products may indirectly undermine the value of guideline-driven obesity treatments. Included in this study is a systematic review of the literature of purported dietary supplements and alternative therapies for weight loss. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of dietary supplements and alternative therapies for weight loss in participants aged ≥18 years. Searches of Medline (PubMed), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Embase (Ovid) were conducted. Risk of bias and results were summarized qualitatively. Results: Of the 20,504 citations retrieved in the database search, 1,743 full-text articles were reviewed, 315 of which were randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of 14 purported dietary supplements, therapies, or a combination thereof. Risk of bias and sufficiency of data varied widely. Few studies (n = 52 [16.5%]) were classified as low risk and sufficient to support efficacy. Of these, only 16 (31%) noted significant pre/post intergroup differences in weight (range: 0.3-4.93 kg). Conclusions: Dietary supplements and alternative therapies for weight loss have a limited high-quality evidence base of efficacy. Practitioners and patients should be aware of the scientific evidence of claims before recommending use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1102-1113
Number of pages12
JournalObesity
Volume29
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Endocrinology
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Systematic Review of Dietary Supplements and Alternative Therapies for Weight Loss'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this