A Shadow’s Influence? How the Shadow Docket Influences Public Opinion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Does increased use of the shadow docket influence public opinion of the Supreme Court? In recent years, the shadow docket of the Supreme Court has been used with increased frequency to make important decisions. The little research done previously on this docket has led to speculation that the shadow docket creates potential problems with perceptions of legitimacy for the Court. I theorize that procedures matter in changing public opinion of an institution when the procedures are nontransparent, stray from expected norms, and are thus perceived as politically unfair. I administered a survey experiment and find evidence to suggest that use of the shadow docket procedure does lead to less support for decisions as well as an increased support for measures of broad court curbing. The results have important implications for approval of the Court as well as the role of the Court in a transparent democracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-263
Number of pages15
JournalAmerican Politics Research
Volume52
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • court
  • docket
  • legitimacy
  • public opinion
  • supreme
  • the new normal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Shadow’s Influence? How the Shadow Docket Influences Public Opinion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this