TY - JOUR
T1 - A Motivational Interviewing Intervention for Adolescents in Accelerated High School Curricula
T2 - Applicability and Acceptability in a Second Sample
AU - Suldo, Shannon M.
AU - Wang, Joy Huanhuan
AU - O’Brennan, Lindsey M.
AU - Shaunessy-Dedrick, Elizabeth
AU - Dedrick, Robert F.
AU - DiLeo, Letty L.
AU - Ferron, John M.
AU - Lee, Jon
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Society for Prevention Research.
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - The paper describes the applicability and acceptability of a selective intervention—Motivation, Assessment, and Planning (MAP)—for high school students that was developed based on the principles of motivational interviewing (MI) and tailored to the unique needs and strengths of students taking accelerated coursework, specifically Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) classes. In addition to detailing the intervention in terms of MI spirit, processes, and relational and technical skills, we report applicability and acceptability data from a second iteration of MAP implementation in eight AP/IB programs in a Southeastern state during spring 2018. We analyzed quantitative and qualitative acceptability data from 121 high school freshmen (97 from AP and 24 from IB courses), as well as the seven MAP coaches who were trained using the Motivational Interview Training and Assessment System (Frey et al. 2017). To gain perspectives from the intended end users of the refined MAP, 12 school counselors and school psychologists who were not trained in MAP evaluated the intervention and provided qualitative and quantitative data on applicability and acceptability. All three stakeholder groups (students, coaches, and school mental health staff) rated and described the intervention as highly acceptable and appropriate for addressing the social-emotional needs of adolescents in AP/IB classes.
AB - The paper describes the applicability and acceptability of a selective intervention—Motivation, Assessment, and Planning (MAP)—for high school students that was developed based on the principles of motivational interviewing (MI) and tailored to the unique needs and strengths of students taking accelerated coursework, specifically Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate (IB) classes. In addition to detailing the intervention in terms of MI spirit, processes, and relational and technical skills, we report applicability and acceptability data from a second iteration of MAP implementation in eight AP/IB programs in a Southeastern state during spring 2018. We analyzed quantitative and qualitative acceptability data from 121 high school freshmen (97 from AP and 24 from IB courses), as well as the seven MAP coaches who were trained using the Motivational Interview Training and Assessment System (Frey et al. 2017). To gain perspectives from the intended end users of the refined MAP, 12 school counselors and school psychologists who were not trained in MAP evaluated the intervention and provided qualitative and quantitative data on applicability and acceptability. All three stakeholder groups (students, coaches, and school mental health staff) rated and described the intervention as highly acceptable and appropriate for addressing the social-emotional needs of adolescents in AP/IB classes.
KW - Early intervention
KW - Gifted students
KW - High school accelerated curricula
KW - Motivational interviewing
KW - Multi-tiered system of support (MTSS)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100568389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100568389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11121-021-01204-z
DO - 10.1007/s11121-021-01204-z
M3 - Article
C2 - 33544310
AN - SCOPUS:85100568389
SN - 1389-4986
VL - 22
SP - 811
EP - 825
JO - Prevention Science
JF - Prevention Science
IS - 6
ER -