A compilation of soybean ESTs: Generation and analysis

Randy Shoemaker, Paul Keim, Lila Vodkin, Ernest Retzel, Sandra W. Clifton, Robert Waterston, David Smoller, Virginia Coryell, Anupama Khanna, John Erpelding, Xiaowu Gai, Volker Brendel, Christina Raph-Schmidt, E. G. Shoop, C. J. Vielweber, Matt Schmatz, Deana Pape, Yvette Bowers, Brenda Theising, John MartinMichael Dante, Todd Wylie, Cheryl Granger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

111 Scopus citations


Whole-genome sequencing is fundamental to understanding the genetic composition of an organism. Given the size and complexity of the soybean genome, an alternative approach is targeted random-gene sequencing, which provides an immediate and productive method of gene discovery. In this study, more than 120 000 soybean expressed sequence tags (ESTs) generated from more than 50 cDNA libraries were evaluated. These ESTs coalesced into 16 928 contigs and 17 336 singletons. On average, each contig was composed of 6 ESTs and spanned 788 bases. The average sequence length submitted to dbEST was 414 bases. Using only those libraries generating more than 800 ESTs each and only those contigs with 10 or more ESTs each, correlated patterns of gene expression among libraries and genes were discerned. Two-dimensional qualitative representations of contig and library similarities were generated based on expression profiles. Genes with similar expression patterns and, potentially, similar functions were identified. These studies provide a rich source of publicly available gene sequences as well as valuable insight into the structure, function, and evolution of a model crop legume genome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-338
Number of pages10
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2002


  • Functional genomics
  • Genome sequencing
  • Glycine max

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biotechnology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics


Dive into the research topics of 'A compilation of soybean ESTs: Generation and analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this