A comparison of lectrocochleography recording techniques

M. Wende Yellin; Kathy K. Chase

doi:10.1097/00003446-199112000-00008

A comparison of lectrocochleography recording techniques

M. Wende Yellin, Kathy K. Chase

Communication Sciences and Disorders

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Dual channel electrocochleography recordings were obtained in 50 ears (25 patients). The summating potential/ action potential amplitude ratios from horizontal and vertical recording montages were compared. Our findings show good summating potential/action potential ratio agreement between the two recording montages when an established normal criterion is used. Further statistical analysis may allow us to use the horizontal and vertical montages interchangeably to aid in the identification of summating and action potentials.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	434-436
Number of pages	3
Journal	Ear and Hearing
Volume	12
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199112000-00008
State	Published - Dec 1991

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Otorhinolaryngology
Speech and Hearing

Access to Document

10.1097/00003446-199112000-00008

Cite this

@article{433e969f11684665b69d455d19236dfd,

title = "A comparison of lectrocochleography recording techniques",

abstract = "Dual channel electrocochleography recordings were obtained in 50 ears (25 patients). The summating potential/ action potential amplitude ratios from horizontal and vertical recording montages were compared. Our findings show good summating potential/action potential ratio agreement between the two recording montages when an established normal criterion is used. Further statistical analysis may allow us to use the horizontal and vertical montages interchangeably to aid in the identification of summating and action potentials.",

author = "Yellin, {M. Wende} and Chase, {Kathy K.}",

year = "1991",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1097/00003446-199112000-00008",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "12",

pages = "434--436",

journal = "Ear and Hearing",

issn = "0196-0202",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of lectrocochleography recording techniques

AU - Yellin, M. Wende

AU - Chase, Kathy K.

PY - 1991/12

Y1 - 1991/12

N2 - Dual channel electrocochleography recordings were obtained in 50 ears (25 patients). The summating potential/ action potential amplitude ratios from horizontal and vertical recording montages were compared. Our findings show good summating potential/action potential ratio agreement between the two recording montages when an established normal criterion is used. Further statistical analysis may allow us to use the horizontal and vertical montages interchangeably to aid in the identification of summating and action potentials.

AB - Dual channel electrocochleography recordings were obtained in 50 ears (25 patients). The summating potential/ action potential amplitude ratios from horizontal and vertical recording montages were compared. Our findings show good summating potential/action potential ratio agreement between the two recording montages when an established normal criterion is used. Further statistical analysis may allow us to use the horizontal and vertical montages interchangeably to aid in the identification of summating and action potentials.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026324054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026324054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00003446-199112000-00008

DO - 10.1097/00003446-199112000-00008

M3 - Article

C2 - 1797611

AN - SCOPUS:0026324054

SN - 0196-0202

VL - 12

SP - 434

EP - 436

JO - Ear and Hearing

JF - Ear and Hearing

IS - 6

ER -

A comparison of lectrocochleography recording techniques

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this