TY - JOUR
T1 - A Community-Engaged Approach to Environmental Health Research
T2 - Process and Lessons Learned
AU - Baldwin, Julie A.
AU - Trotter, Robert T.
AU - Remiker, Mark
AU - Loren Buck, C.
AU - Aguirre, Amanda
AU - Milner, Trudie
AU - Torres, Emma
AU - von Hippel, Frank A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Johns Hopkins University Press.
PY - 2021/12/1
Y1 - 2021/12/1
N2 - Background: This study used a community-engaged approach to examine associations between environmental contaminants and health outcomes among residents of Yuma, Arizona. Our team conducted a process evaluation to assess scientific rigor and adherence to community engagement principles. Objective: Our evaluation focused on four dimensions of community-based participatory research: 1) context, 2) group dynamics, 3) intervention and research, and 4) outcomes. Methods: Interviews were conducted with key informants from community partner organizations. Thematic analysis was used to evaluate community partners’ experiences with our collaborative process. Lessons Learned: Community partners reported collaborat-ing to establish research goals, recruit participants, collect data, plan analyses, and formulate dissemination strategies. Training needs, roles, and expectations of community partners varied based on available resources, prior research experience, and perceived research challenges. Conclusions: Leveraging community-engaged principles for studies of environmental contamination can expedite recruit-ment efforts and stimulate action to improve health outcomes.
AB - Background: This study used a community-engaged approach to examine associations between environmental contaminants and health outcomes among residents of Yuma, Arizona. Our team conducted a process evaluation to assess scientific rigor and adherence to community engagement principles. Objective: Our evaluation focused on four dimensions of community-based participatory research: 1) context, 2) group dynamics, 3) intervention and research, and 4) outcomes. Methods: Interviews were conducted with key informants from community partner organizations. Thematic analysis was used to evaluate community partners’ experiences with our collaborative process. Lessons Learned: Community partners reported collaborat-ing to establish research goals, recruit participants, collect data, plan analyses, and formulate dissemination strategies. Training needs, roles, and expectations of community partners varied based on available resources, prior research experience, and perceived research challenges. Conclusions: Leveraging community-engaged principles for studies of environmental contamination can expedite recruit-ment efforts and stimulate action to improve health outcomes.
KW - Agriculture
KW - Community health partnerships
KW - Environmental illness
KW - Health disparities
KW - Southwestern United States
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123036956&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123036956&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1353/cpr.2021.0043
DO - 10.1353/cpr.2021.0043
M3 - Article
C2 - 34975035
AN - SCOPUS:85123036956
SN - 1557-0541
VL - 15
SP - 533
EP - 540
JO - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
JF - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
IS - 4
ER -