Replication Data for: Democracy Promotion and Electoral Quality: A Disaggregated Analysis

  • Carie A. Steele (Contributor)
  • Daniel Pemstein (Contributor)
  • Stephen A. Meserve (Contributor)

Dataset

Description

The international community spends significant sums of money on democracy promotion, focusing especially on producing competitive and transparent electoral environments. In theory, aid empowers a variety of actors, increasing competition and government responsiveness. We argue that to fully understand the effect of aid on democratization one must consider how democracy aid affects specific country institutions. Building on theory from the democratization and democracy promotion literature, we specify more precise causal linkages between democracy assistance and elections. Specifically, we hypothesize about the effects of democracy aid on the implementation and quality of elections. We test these hypotheses using V-Dem's detailed elections measures, using Finkel, Pérez-Liñán, Seligson’s (2007) data and modeling strategy, to examine the impact of democracy aid. Intriguingly, we find that there is no consistent relationship between democracy and governance aid and the improvement of disaggregated indicators of election quality, but aggregate measures still capture a relationship. We suggest that current evidence is more consistent with election-enhancing aid following democratization than with democratization following such aid.
Date made availableJan 1 2020
PublisherHarvard Dataverse

Cite this